EVALUATION OF THE CONCORDANCE BETWEEN SARS-CoV-2 REALTIME RT-PCR RESULTS USING COBAS 6800 SYSTEM AND WHO PROTOCOL

Van Doan , Thi Hong Phuong Nguyen, Hong Quan Duong, Dinh Trang Van, Ngoc Pham, Nguyen Minh Hoa Le

Main Article Content

Abstract

The clinical diagnostic efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 PCR methods plays a vital role in case detection, treatment and epidemic prevention. We conducted this study to evaluate the concordance of Realtime RT-PCR test results performed on Cobas 6800 system comparing with the procedure recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 309 nasopharyngeal swab samples collected at the National Hospital for Tropical Diseases from 2020 to 2022. The results showed that the Cobas 6800 system detected more positive samples than those tested by the WHO protocol, in which the number of positive samples tested by the WHO and Cobas 6800 protocol were 232/309 (75%) 281/309 (91%), respectively. The Kappa coefficient reflects the similarity between the two test methods was 0.43, corresponding to the average degree of concordance. The average difference between the Ct value of the E gene according to the WHO protocol compared with the Ct value of the ORF gene and the E gene on Cobas 6800 is 3.18 and 2.38, respectively, indicating a 10-time higher of virus-detecting capacity when using COBAS 6800 system compared to WHO protocol. Thus, the automated COBAS 6800 system should be used in urgent situations such as a novel epidemic for screening large numbers of samples as well as avoiding false negative results.

Article Details

References

1. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239-42.
2. Biên SVsvYht--NXBYH-GLHCc. nhà xuất bản y học, 2007.
3. Astuti I, Ysrafil. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): An overview of viral structure and host response. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4):407-12.
4. Fontanet A, Autran B, Lina B, Kieny MP, Karim SSA, Sridhar D. SARS-CoV-2 variants and ending the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021;397(10278):952-4.
5. https://www.who.int/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants.
6. Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT PCR (Berlin Jan 17th, 2020).
7. Pujadas E, Ibeh N, Hernandez MM, Waluszko A, Sidorenko T, Flores V, et al. Comparison of SARSCoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal swab samples by the Roche cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 test and a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR test. J Med Virol. 2020;92(9):1695-8.
8. You HL, Lin MC, Lee CH. Comparison of the Roche cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 test and the Taiwan CDC protocol for the molecular diagnosis of COVID-19. Biomed J. 2021;44(1):101-4.